A successful vaporization requires temperatures of 150-200°C with a max of 250 for self-experimenting enthusiasts.
So when these studies include the chemicals caused by pyrolysis, they're not studying realistic e-cigarette use.
A good analogy would be studying the consumption of improperly distilled alcohol that included methanol- EXCEPT you wouldn't be able to taste the methanol in bad liquor, and you'd absolutely be able to taste burnt e-liquid.
Which of course doesn't mean it is good for us but I think establishes that the danger from that is probably less scary than that sounds
While I'm not sure what temperature these devices target, what I know is that the researchers found that longer into a usage session the coils became hotter and produced larger quantities carcinogens.
My understanding though is that while e-cigarettes do produce carcinogens, they produce less quantities than regular cigarettes do.
I guess you had the link to the survey ready and just forgot to paste it. Would you find that again, please?
So, yes, I agree: this warrants much further study. I have not come to any conclusions, but I have updated my priros. But, independent of that, I felt some comments in this thread were misrepresenting what the research did.
E-cigarette liquid, at it's base, has two chemicals: propylene glycol and nicotine.
Anything other than that is a flavor additive, or a smoke volume additive (glycerine). PG and Glycerine are extensively studied and safe for human consumption, PG is actually used in nebulizer treatments for people with asthma.
Furthermore, a proper e-cigarette doesn't cause a chemical change in the liquid- it's only a physical state change. That precludes the oxidation reactions that characterize tobacco smoking.
So my skepticism is really tweaked by this article. Yes, someone could potentially add hundreds of flavoring chemicals. Definitely room for a problem there, so address that. The essential cigarette is only two to three chemicals.