But the fact remains, total assholes are capable of being ethical and moral, and the nicest person in the world can be a horrorshow.
Coming off as nice doesn't tell us anything about character, even though we are wired to feel otherwise.
He is the CEO, who has been caught red-handed being various flavors of deceptive, assholish, unconcerned with the externalities caused by his actions, not to mention several deeply unethical acts across years of time. That's before we get to the actions of his minions.
I have trouble understanding how you can credit him with success (which naturally means he "earned" his billions) while claiming he should be shielded from the fallout of his own and his reports' actions.
I can't agree with that statement. He's responsible for both. He doesn't get to take credit for the good and ignore the bad.
And his past actions have shown that's not far off; that he does behave in a manner consistent with Uber's bad actions.
Anyone with an iota of a moral compass would be able to understand whats wrong here. Travis wasnt able to.
He is a nice guy, he helps people, and he has strong passion in hating the failure. Is Uber too aggressive? Maybe yes - but you need to be aggressive to fight regulations, governments, taxi cartels and the like all over the world.
On a personal note, having worked for a period with Travis at RedSwoosh, I think he's getting the raw end of this deal. He's a really great entrepreneur and a nice enough guy. He pushes hard but and plays to win; as the CEO, he's getting an inordinate amount of fallout from these issues. I would say he's not the root cause of the issues but he is the root cause of Uber's success. Uber will not be the same without him.