News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Intelligent Tracking Prevention by ForHackernews on Thursday June 08, 2017 @04:13AM (#14512709)
> user tracking is required by websites to prevent being completely defrauded by ad providers / advertisers being defrauded by click bot farms.

Maybe don't pay for clicks, only pay for sales.

Re:Intelligent Tracking Prevention by spiderfarmer on Thursday June 08, 2017 @04:16AM (#14512715)
How would you keep track of the sales without cookies? Most people don't buy on the first visit.
Re:Intelligent Tracking Prevention by ForHackernews on Thursday June 08, 2017 @04:38AM (#14512806)
Unless I'm misunderstanding, the technology described in the article is designed to fight against cross-site tracking (i.e. following users all over the internet to different sites)

I suspect few users would object to a single web property remembering them across multiple visits.

Re:Intelligent Tracking Prevention by spiderfarmer on Thursday June 08, 2017 @04:48AM (#14512845)
So you'll have to rely on the webshop to keep track of purchases? I'd rather have a third party involved that has to keep both the publisher and the advertiser happy.
Re:Intelligent Tracking Prevention by ryan-c on Thursday June 08, 2017 @11:57AM (#14515065)
That gets defrauded via a technique called "cookie stuffing".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cookie_stuffing

Re:Intelligent Tracking Prevention by ThrowAway123543 on Thursday June 08, 2017 @03:55PM (#14516732)
...which can be stymied by using first-party cookies for lead attribution, which is exactly what webkit is recommending that sites switch to. Voila!