News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Assembling WebAssembly by majewsky on Wednesday June 07, 2017 @04:32AM (#14504579)
HTML/CSS/JS has some huge advantages from the user perspective. When a designer has made some questionable choices, all it takes is a user stylesheet or a quick tour to the devtools to fix the font size and contrast ratio.

The whole world of extensions that improve existing websites with additional buttons etc. is only possible because the page structure is exposed in the DOM. If Reddit were only WASM rendering on a <canvas>, there were no "Better Reddit" extensions.

Re:Assembling WebAssembly by baq on Wednesday June 07, 2017 @04:52AM (#14504648)
there's reddit and then there are all the in house enterprise-ish apps that basically amount to moving buckets of bits between cross-linked tables for which html+css is not cost effective.
Re:Assembling WebAssembly by k__ on Wednesday June 07, 2017 @04:50AM (#14504640)
Also, nobody wants to pay a C++ dev for doing a JS devs work, haha
Re:Assembling WebAssembly by jlebrech on Wednesday June 07, 2017 @04:59AM (#14504683)
you can still code in js or any other language.
Re:Assembling WebAssembly by k__ on Wednesday June 07, 2017 @09:54AM (#14506440)
I know.

I just thought, with JavaScript front-end development has been commoditized and C++ is harder than JavaScript. So I don't think many people would pay a more expensive C++ dev to use Qt for a WASM based app, if they could get it all going with a cheap JS dev.

Re:Assembling WebAssembly by fpoling on Wednesday June 07, 2017 @05:25AM (#14504785)
It is more like "you can code in any language as long as it JS".
Re:Assembling WebAssembly by jlebrech on Wednesday June 07, 2017 @04:37AM (#14504596)
reddit would probably have an opensource rendering layer or third party uis that use it's api.

wasm will be the new android without the need to install apps.

Re:Assembling WebAssembly by majewsky on Wednesday June 07, 2017 @07:14AM (#14505216)
That's what they said about HTML 5, too.