News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why we should love null results by lobotryas on Sunday June 04, 2017 @03:14PM (#14483002)
As another native speaker I can say that "guys" refers to a mixed gender group perfectly well. Saying that it implies a predominantly male group is more indicative of your personal life experiences or bias.

Regarding GP, my only guess is that they were virtue signaling because they explicitly went out of their way to make that point. If they really wanted to avoid gendered nouns they could have written "folks", "people", or any number of similar words (kind of like how I'm doing here, by not assuming GP's gender).

Re:Why we should love null results by falsedan on Sunday June 04, 2017 @03:49PM (#14483165)
'Folk' is fine, though try to work out how to drop 'comrade' into your vocab.

In this particular case, the OP could have used 'researchers' and: 1. avoided putting off/distracting people by the use of gendered language; 2. been more precise.

Re:Why we should love null results by GavinMcG on Sunday June 04, 2017 @05:04PM (#14483492)
Also a native speaker, here.

Seems to me that "guys" can refer to a group of men, or to a mixed-gender group, but not to a group of women. So while it's absolutely the case that it can refer to a mixed-gender group, using it that way is still problematic in that it emphasizes men's membership.

Re:Why we should love null results by lucasmullens on Sunday June 04, 2017 @06:34PM (#14484027)
I use "guys" to refer to groups of women all the time. I don't think people who say "you guys" check and make sure it isn't 100% women before saying it.