Re:Do companies exist where software isn't done with chewing...
by UK-AL on Wednesday May 24, 2017 @09:58AM
(#14410033)
Yes, but CRUD applications are typically done for small applications on uninteresting problems where people don't really care about code quality. So they have a bad reputation.
The worst CRUD applications, is where they've been extended where they are no longer CRUD but the architecture still assumes CRUD.
Re:Do companies exist where software isn't done with chewing...
by wayn3 on Wednesday May 24, 2017 @11:30AM
(#14410731)
maybe i just dont care
maybe it was intentionally conflated to call CRUD usually crappily-built
maybe i dont subscribe to your nomenclature
maybe you can have well-built crud apps (omg I did it again and this time its an oxymoron), but if you pick out a crud app at random, I'll give you 10:1 odds that its code quality is absolute garbage
Re:Do companies exist where software isn't done with chewing...
by tbihl on Wednesday May 24, 2017 @02:47PM
(#14412421)
Alternatively,if we're being pedantic, we can go to the original definition, Chalk River Unidentified Deposit (later determined to be activated corrosion products.)
Re:Do companies exist where software isn't done with chewing...
by jamessb on Friday May 26, 2017 @07:53AM
(#14423408)
This seems to be a backronym, rather than the word's actual etymology [1].
[1]: https://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov/2015/03/31/crud-another-...
CRUD != crud
I don't know if you are making this error, but I it all the time on /r/cscareersquestions and it is a foolish conflation.
crud: crappily-built product
CRUD: a set of UI operations on records in your data model.
You can totally have a well-built CRUD app maintained by a team that cares about code quality.