Facebook's internal rulebook on sex, terrorism and violence

Re:Facebook's internal rulebook on sex, terrorism and violence by matt4077 on Sunday May 21, 2017 @10:15PM (#14390514)

That's probably a good example of why "freedom" isn't the right way to measure a community's value. Because the entirety of all youtube comments' value can only be measured in what worse things they authors were prevented from doing while commenting there.

Freedom of speech is great, and important. That doesn't mean that there's any value in just anybody exploring the boundaries of it.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Facebook's internal rulebook on sex, terrorism and violence by qb45 on Monday May 22, 2017 @01:45AM (#14391258)

> Because the entirety of all youtube comments' value can only be measured in what worse things they authors were prevented from doing while commenting there.

This says more about your sampling bias than youtube itself.

And the fact you are posting this says more about the magnitude of your political bias (its exact direction being yet tbd) than anything you read. I'm not sure if you realize how many nuts really say what they believe and believe what they say.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Facebook's internal rulebook on sex, terrorism and violence by coldtea on Monday May 22, 2017 @07:24AM (#14392613)

>This says more about your sampling bias than youtube itself. And the fact you are posting this says more about the magnitude of your political bias (its exact direction being yet tbd) than anything you read.

And both of the above say more about your willingness to characterize the parent than about the issue under discussion.

>I'm not sure if you realize how many nuts really say what they believe and believe what they say.

Doesn't seem to matter, as long as they don't also ACT on what they believe/say. Which is the case for most people (both positive, e.g. they are racist but they wont act on it, and negative, e.g. they say their are this or that good thing, but they're all talk about it).

[ Parent | on HN ]