News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Cisco's Talos team analysis of WannaCry worm. Parent comment

Re:Cisco's Talos team analysis of WannaCry worm by mattnewton on Saturday May 13, 2017 @06:22AM (#14330239)
Research with modern tooling like git?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Cisco's Talos team analysis of WannaCry worm by themihai on Saturday May 13, 2017 @08:27AM (#14330616)
I still believe you should be able to send files through email. Why should I setup a git server( static ip + domain name) to share a piece of code? What's next? "Modern tooling" like Google Docs instead of local apps?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Cisco's Talos team analysis of WannaCry worm by jlg23 on Saturday May 13, 2017 @10:58AM (#14331282)
> I still believe you should be able to send files through email.

Refusing to listen to what people have been telling you since the inception of email does not make you right, though.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Cisco's Talos team analysis of WannaCry worm by woah on Saturday May 13, 2017 @10:45AM (#14331231)
If it's too long to send in the body of the email, it should probably be in git.
[ Parent | on HN ]