News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Americans' Access to Strong Encryption Is at Risk, an Ope... by azinman2 on Wednesday May 03, 2017 @09:44PM (#14261790)
Wait does he have a Masters in Information Security from the College of Computing at the Georgia Institute of Technology???!

Joking aside, unfortunately it takes deep problems to motivate people/the US to change. It'll swing this way, and there will be dramatic consequences. Only then will things swing back the other way.

It's too bad there isn't any balance here -- it does make sense in many situations that the police/courts should be able to gain access to information. But encryption doesn't care about the situation. Encryption doesn't care who you are. Encryption has no contextual morales of its own.

If data had physical weight, where things that were important we're really hard to steal, then it'd function like the real world. But data does not, and it's too easy to download gigs of data one should never have access to. It's very difficult to gain a middle ground as suggested by Pelosi. I don't know if she understands that.

Re:Americans' Access to Strong Encryption Is at Risk, an Ope... by fiatpandas on Wednesday May 03, 2017 @10:05PM (#14261873)
You make fun of someone for stating their credentials but you do the same in your profile. I guess your joke is that his credentials are laughable compared to the credentials of other people (e.g. MIT grads). Or is the joke that he stated it so clearly so early in the letter? I'm not sure.
Re:Americans' Access to Strong Encryption Is at Risk, an Ope... by azinman2 on Wednesday May 03, 2017 @11:31PM (#14262232)
It's mentioned in the first few sentences and 2 more times in the same page.

My HN "bio" isn't a blog post. I dont start my communication that way.

Re:Americans' Access to Strong Encryption Is at Risk, an Ope... by rietta on Wednesday May 03, 2017 @11:36PM (#14262257)
Deploying to remove the first reference. I see your point.
Re:Americans' Access to Strong Encryption Is at Risk, an Ope... by mirimir on Wednesday May 03, 2017 @10:25PM (#14261953)
Hey, so you could write an even more credible letter :)

Also, data does have "weight". The more data that you move, the more obvious the movement is. And the more you obfuscate the connection, the less bandwidth you have.

But yes, Pelosi is clueless.

Re:Americans' Access to Strong Encryption Is at Risk, an Ope... by azinman2 on Wednesday May 03, 2017 @11:33PM (#14262240)
It's that it's mentioned 3 times within like 2 screenfuls that I'm poking fun at.
Re:Americans' Access to Strong Encryption Is at Risk, an Ope... by mirimir on Thursday May 04, 2017 @12:40AM (#14262505)
Ah, I didn't catch that. And he's edited.
Re:Americans' Access to Strong Encryption Is at Risk, an Ope... by xapata on Wednesday May 03, 2017 @10:54PM (#14262068)
It looks like you forgot to pay your Squarespace bill: "This account has expired. ( http://empiric.al )"

Joking aside, I guess you're saying that leading with credentials in an article is unnecessary if that article is relatively short and you've got a bio blurb at the bottom of the page?

Re:Americans' Access to Strong Encryption Is at Risk, an Ope... by rietta on Wednesday May 03, 2017 @11:06PM (#14262113)
That's actually a good point. I originally wrote this as a private message to each of the Congressional candidates in the Georgia 6th district and in that format there was not the bio and all the surrounding blog template. It feels weird to be to lead with it too, but I'm trying to answer real quick to a politician who does not know the science why he or she should read on to the next paragraph.
Re:Americans' Access to Strong Encryption Is at Risk, an Ope... by xapata on Wednesday May 03, 2017 @11:11PM (#14262132)
I think you're discovering that text written for one medium might benefit from revision when published elsewhere. :-)

Also, I think it's reasonable these days to write hardcopy letters that look more like websites -- multiple columns, a bio section, etc. Don't restrict yourself to obsolete and arbitrary etiquette.

Re:Americans' Access to Strong Encryption Is at Risk, an Ope... by azinman2 on Wednesday May 03, 2017 @11:34PM (#14262250)
It's not just the bio blurb, but the credentials beneath the conclusion, and the beginning of the article as well.

Empirical is no more, we're at ginger.io now. Haven't bothered updating various bits.

Re:Americans' Access to Strong Encryption Is at Risk, an Ope... by xapata on Wednesday May 03, 2017 @11:38PM (#14262261)
You could have made that criticism in a more kind tone. As a researcher on interacting with strangers on the internet, I'd expect you to be more cautious that your comments aren't accidentally read in a negative light.
Re:Americans' Access to Strong Encryption Is at Risk, an Ope... by azinman2 on Wednesday May 03, 2017 @11:55PM (#14262333)
I figured the joke would be obvious to anyone read the article.... wasn't meant to be negative or mean.
Re:Americans' Access to Strong Encryption Is at Risk, an Ope... by xapata on Thursday May 04, 2017 @01:22AM (#14262617)
I read the article, but I misread your comment as mean-spirited. I didn't read the author's bio initially due to banner-blindness perhaps.
Re:Americans' Access to Strong Encryption Is at Risk, an Ope... by fjert on Wednesday May 03, 2017 @11:23PM (#14262186)
What is the significance of his masters being from Georgia Tech?
Re:Americans' Access to Strong Encryption Is at Risk, an Ope... by azinman2 on Wednesday May 03, 2017 @11:35PM (#14262254)
You tell me? It's mentioned 3 times on that page.
Re:Americans' Access to Strong Encryption Is at Risk, an Ope... by rietta on Wednesday May 03, 2017 @11:43PM (#14262282)
I've updated the page to remove the references except for in the bio. I got tripped up with the open letter format as a blog post when I had written most of it previously for private email use. I do appreciate the feedback and hopefully this revision will make it stronger when members of Congress do read it. As for the significance, it's the relevant degree that I have to the content of the letter.
Re:Americans' Access to Strong Encryption Is at Risk, an Ope... by azinman2 on Wednesday May 03, 2017 @11:54PM (#14262330)
I'm not trying to cast doubt on your credibility. The content speaks for itself. It was just funny to me to see it listed so many times and have it open that way.