Americans' Access to Strong Encryption Is at Risk, an Open Letter to Congress

Re:Americans' Access to Strong Encryption Is at Risk, an Ope... by azinman2 on Wednesday May 03, 2017 @11:34PM (#14262250)

It's not just the bio blurb, but the credentials beneath the conclusion, and the beginning of the article as well.

Empirical is no more, we're at ginger.io now. Haven't bothered updating various bits.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Americans' Access to Strong Encryption Is at Risk, an Ope... by xapata on Wednesday May 03, 2017 @11:38PM (#14262261)

You could have made that criticism in a more kind tone. As a researcher on interacting with strangers on the internet, I'd expect you to be more cautious that your comments aren't accidentally read in a negative light.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Americans' Access to Strong Encryption Is at Risk, an Ope... by azinman2 on Wednesday May 03, 2017 @11:55PM (#14262333)

I figured the joke would be obvious to anyone read the article.... wasn't meant to be negative or mean.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Americans' Access to Strong Encryption Is at Risk, an Ope... by xapata on Thursday May 04, 2017 @01:22AM (#14262617)

I read the article, but I misread your comment as mean-spirited. I didn't read the author's bio initially due to banner-blindness perhaps.

[ Parent | on HN ]