Re:The licensing program for MP3-related patents has been te...
by amelius on Tuesday May 02, 2017 @03:15AM
(#14244532)
Why can my friends who studied medicine, physics, and mechanical engineering make money with their inventions, while I, software engineer, cannot?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The licensing program for MP3-related patents has been te...
by bonzini on Tuesday May 02, 2017 @03:19AM
(#14244545)
Your friends who studied math cannot make money with their inventions either, and your inventions are really _a lot_ like math.
Re:The licensing program for MP3-related patents has been te...
by bogositosius on Tuesday May 02, 2017 @03:18AM
(#14244543)
Since when is a patent required to make money off software?
Re:The licensing program for MP3-related patents has been te...
by amelius on Tuesday May 02, 2017 @04:15AM
(#14244793)
That's not making money off software. That's making money off software AND business efforts.
Re:The licensing program for MP3-related patents has been te...
by bogositosius on Tuesday May 02, 2017 @06:38AM
(#14245323)
And you want to make money off software AND patent efforts.
So, again, why do you think the patent is the driving factor to making money off software?
Re:The licensing program for MP3-related patents has been te...
by realusername on Tuesday May 02, 2017 @04:38AM
(#14244883)
I've never seen any software worth patenting unlike with other disciplines, maybe it would help the case for software patents if they would be a need for it
Re:The licensing program for MP3-related patents has been te...
by amelius on Tuesday May 02, 2017 @12:13PM
(#14247647)
I don't see why if someone invents a clever way to perform e.g. fluid dynamics simulations in software, that can't be patented just like in other disciplines.
Not all software is just shopping baskets, and website glue logic.