News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The licensing program for MP3-related patents has been te... by amelius on Tuesday May 02, 2017 @03:15AM (#14244532)
Why can my friends who studied medicine, physics, and mechanical engineering make money with their inventions, while I, software engineer, cannot?
Re:The licensing program for MP3-related patents has been te... by bonzini on Tuesday May 02, 2017 @03:19AM (#14244545)
Your friends who studied math cannot make money with their inventions either, and your inventions are really _a lot_ like math.
Re:The licensing program for MP3-related patents has been te... by bogositosius on Tuesday May 02, 2017 @03:18AM (#14244543)
Since when is a patent required to make money off software?
Re:The licensing program for MP3-related patents has been te... by amelius on Tuesday May 02, 2017 @04:15AM (#14244793)
That's not making money off software. That's making money off software AND business efforts.
Re:The licensing program for MP3-related patents has been te... by bogositosius on Tuesday May 02, 2017 @06:38AM (#14245323)
And you want to make money off software AND patent efforts.

So, again, why do you think the patent is the driving factor to making money off software?

Re:The licensing program for MP3-related patents has been te... by realusername on Tuesday May 02, 2017 @04:38AM (#14244883)
I've never seen any software worth patenting unlike with other disciplines, maybe it would help the case for software patents if they would be a need for it
Re:The licensing program for MP3-related patents has been te... by amelius on Tuesday May 02, 2017 @12:13PM (#14247647)
I don't see why if someone invents a clever way to perform e.g. fluid dynamics simulations in software, that can't be patented just like in other disciplines.

Not all software is just shopping baskets, and website glue logic.