However, i3 is quite functional, and Stack supports overlapping when necessary. So there're some UX compatibility problems to think about.
I'd be interested to know what functionality do you really use on a regular basis. Especially, it would be interesting to know _why_ do you use it. E.g. not just "I want to split my screen in half and put W1 to the left, and W2 to the right" but "I want to see all my open windows the most comfortable way possible".
For example: generally you don't just want a chat window constantly visible, you also don't usually need it to take half of 30 inch screen. So with an ideal app you should say, that it does not require more than 10cm width and 6cm height, and WM will figure out the rest.
I'm not a super sophisticated user of it.
I appreciate ability to arbitrarily split panes vertically or horizontally and also moving windows around with alt+shift+hjkl. Alt + enter brings up a new terminal.
Ctrl + d brings up dmenu or similar "global search/run text input".
It's easy to jump around virtual screens/tabs (alt + tab#).
Alt+f full screens a pane.
Basically you don't need the mouse much and it uses hjkl so vim users like it.
If you get those, it's probably pretty good coverage for i3 fans.
- moving windows around is done with Win+Arrow key
- if you want to bring a new terminal with a hotkey, you can just assign one in shortcut properties (that's a Windows feature). Once automation feature is implemented, that terminal will behave similarly (or better than i3).
- sounds like Ctrl + d is basically Win key on Windows, that brings up start menu with integrated search
- virtual screens are already available on Windows 10, and there are hotkeys
- maximizing a window already has a hotkey in Windows 10 as well - Win + Up. Currently, Stack overrides that hotkey though
- hjkl sounds possible, however, I'd like to avoid modes, so they'll have to be used with modifiers
I will see what I can do to make it possible to run similarly to i3.
Every time I use a macbook I twist my fingers horribly to copy and paste.
Regarding your $3 price for the paid version, I think you should be careful not to set the price too low. I happily paid $18 for the professional version of AquaSnap.