News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Optical illusions that flummox computers by amelius on Saturday April 15, 2017 @11:11AM (#14121057)
What happens if you train the system with these optical illusions in place, as well as the original images? Will it become harder to find new illusions? Or will illusions always be able to trick the system no matter how many illusions you trained with?

Remark: I noticed that even a watermark in the lower-left of the image (as you see on TV) can totally mess up DL prediction.

Re:Optical illusions that flummox computers by mholt on Saturday April 15, 2017 @12:22PM (#14121408)
This is called "adversarial training" and is ineffective because of transferability. Also the space of adversarial examples is thought to be large (especially as dimensionality increases), making robust adversarial training intractable in practice. See https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.6199 and https://arxiv.org/abs/1510.05328
Re:Optical illusions that flummox computers by amelius on Saturday April 15, 2017 @04:36PM (#14122714)
Interesting, what do you mean by transferability?
Re:Optical illusions that flummox computers by mholt on Saturday April 15, 2017 @05:08PM (#14122870)
Training a model on adversarial examples essentially is a type of "gradient masking." (https://blog.openai.com/adversarial-example-research/) A model trained on one set of adversarial examples in an attempt to harden it against all adversarial examples is still vulnerable to adversarial examples produced from a totally separate model that performs the same task.