News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Charging Bull sculptor says New York's Fearless Girl stat... by diamonis on Thursday April 13, 2017 @01:07PM (#14108852)
The 'little girl statue' is the artistic equivalent of painting a black mustache on the Mona Lisa with a marker. Pure artistic vandalism.
Re:Charging Bull sculptor says New York's Fearless Girl stat... by Vaskivo on Thursday April 13, 2017 @01:16PM (#14108949)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L.H.O.O.Q.

I know it's not the same thing. But "the Mona Lisa with a mustache" is a work of art.

But I kind of agree with the artist. For some, the space where the artistic object is exposed is as important as the object itself. I can see that the statue of the girl changes the whole space and the bull statue.

I think this could be prevented if they would talk to Di Modica about the new status.

Re:Charging Bull sculptor says New York's Fearless Girl stat... by csours on Thursday April 13, 2017 @01:09PM (#14108872)
What?? No.

It is the artistic equivalent of putting a mustache sculpture in front of the Mona Lisa.

Re:Charging Bull sculptor says New York's Fearless Girl stat... by chadgeidel on Thursday April 13, 2017 @01:10PM (#14108889)
I have no idea how you could make that comparison. The original artwork was neither destroyed, changed, or touched in any way. It's not in any way like "painting a black mustache on the Mona Lisa with a marker".
Re:Charging Bull sculptor says New York's Fearless Girl stat... by diamonis on Thursday April 13, 2017 @01:20PM (#14108999)
Mashups are fine and I support them, fwiw. But putting 'her' in front of the charging bull is a deliberate attempt to change the meaning of his art. It is the attempt of a second rate artist to ride the coat tails of a superior artist. She gets instant notoriety for her work by, not so coincidentally, trashing somebody elses.
Re:Charging Bull sculptor says New York's Fearless Girl stat... by anigbrowl on Thursday April 13, 2017 @01:42PM (#14109195)
Changing the meaning of an existing piece of art isn't vandalism, it is pure art. As an artist myself I reject your claim that Di Modica is somehow a 'superior artist' just because he happened to have his work there first. Kristen Visbal came up with something everyone who sees it reacts to without needing an intermediaries to draw attention to or explain the semantics of her artistic statement, which is precisely the goal of art.
Re:Charging Bull sculptor says New York's Fearless Girl stat... by Chris2048 on Monday April 17, 2017 @01:49PM (#14132929)
> Kristen Visbal came up with something everyone who sees it reacts to without needing an intermediaries to draw attention to or explain the semantics of her artistic statement, which is precisely the goal of art.

So a swastika on a war memorial is also "art"?

Re:Charging Bull sculptor says New York's Fearless Girl stat... by daveguy on Thursday April 13, 2017 @01:12PM (#14108905)
It's as if someone hung a picture of a moustache next to a picture of the Mona Lisa. No copyrights remotely violated.
Re:Charging Bull sculptor says New York's Fearless Girl stat... by justin66 on Thursday April 13, 2017 @01:48PM (#14109258)
It's closer to the equivalent of putting the "Three Soldiers" statue right next to the Vietnam Memorial Wall, except those are works of art that actually matter. I'm not so sure about the bronze statues in NY. If my Facebook feed is any guide, the bull is there because people get a kick out of being photographed next to giant testicles.