News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:United Passenger “Removal”: A Reporting and Management Fa... by consciouskernel on Wednesday April 12, 2017 @07:06PM (#14102575)
You are wrong. Pilot in command[1] only qualifies when the plane is in flight, which is even mentioned in the quora question you linked. In flight definition requires plane to be moving under its own power. Additionally, the pilot did not tell the passenger anything. An on the ground manager did.

You have no idea what you're talking about. Please throw away your throwaway account.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pilot_in_command

Re:United Passenger “Removal”: A Reporting and Management Fa... by dang on Thursday April 13, 2017 @01:47AM (#14104444)
You've been posting uncivilly to HN. We ban accounts that do that, so would you please (re-)read the site rules and comment civilly and substantively from now on?

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

https://news.ycombinator.com/newswelcome.html

Re:United Passenger “Removal”: A Reporting and Management Fa... by consciouskernel on Thursday April 13, 2017 @03:18AM (#14104828)
> read the site rules and comment civilly and substantively

Civilly I can give you, but substantively?

> The test for substance is a lot like it is for links. Does your comment teach us anything?

I don't understand how you can claim I'm not commenting "substantively" when I'm correcting blatantly wrong info with citations.

Re:United Passenger “Removal”: A Reporting and Management Fa... by dang on Thursday April 13, 2017 @04:32AM (#14105172)
If you edit the uncivil parts out of your comments and leave only the substantive parts, that would be just fine.