News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Chatbots have struggled to live up to the hype by afro88 on Monday April 03, 2017 @02:36AM (#14020984)
> IMO chatbots are the online equivalent of getting an automated response from a phone line

I agree, but that doesn't mean they're as bad as them.

It's _much_ faster to read a text and reply with a word/number/tap than it is to wait for the option you want to be read out to you: "for x press 1, for y press 2... for z press 9". Or worse, have to speak what you want, wait for it to parse what you said, and then ask you to confirm.

Re:Chatbots have struggled to live up to the hype by ipsi on Monday April 03, 2017 @06:33AM (#14021790)
They're also superior (and less stressful) for a certain type of person - for example, my mother appears to be slowing down a bit, mentally, as she gets older, and a chat bot would be a lot easier for her to navigate over a phone menu, because she has time to read it and think about it without feeling pressured to key in a response before the phone menu times out. And she doesn't have to worry about forgetting what the phone menu said because, hey, it's all on screen.
Re:Chatbots have struggled to live up to the hype by azinman2 on Monday April 03, 2017 @03:06AM (#14021089)
Except, the phone tree isn't what's on the web. So really you're putting texting against a webpage or an app, which will always deliver a better ux because they're unconstrained.