News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Bigger brains are not always better by mej10 on Wednesday March 29, 2017 @10:24AM (#13986460)
This is orthogonal to the claim.

There are hypotheses that Neanderthals were actually smarter than our other ancestors, and that they were wiped out for various reasons unrelated to intelligence. They may have been less violent than homo sapiens or seriously weakened by pathogens that didn't affect homo sapiens.

Re:Bigger brains are not always better by Mikeb85 on Wednesday March 29, 2017 @10:41AM (#13986645)
Or simply less numerous. We do know that many of us (Europeans and Asians) have some Neanderthal DNA, it's entirely possible they were just bred out of existence.
Re:Bigger brains are not always better by temp246810 on Wednesday March 29, 2017 @12:20PM (#13987762)
According to 21andMe, I am a whopping 3% neanderthal.

Don't know why I felt compelled to share this here, alas, there you go.

Re:Bigger brains are not always better by emmelaich on Wednesday March 29, 2017 @10:43PM (#13992464)
That's 23andme. I also have a high Neanderthal percentage.

Wikipedia says modern humans have somewhere between 1% and 4%.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neanderthal#Genome

Re:Bigger brains are not always better by temp246810 on Thursday March 30, 2017 @12:22PM (#13996720)
Right on, something seemed off in the name but I just didn't look it up. Should have known too, 23x2=56.
Re:Bigger brains are not always better by magic_beans on Wednesday March 29, 2017 @01:23PM (#13988521)
Most Asian and European people have neanderthal DNA.
Re:Bigger brains are not always better by hectorperez on Wednesday March 29, 2017 @11:10AM (#13987001)
I didn't say that we are smarter.

However, a smaller brain might have been better at that time. For example, a bigger brain requires more energy.

On the other hand, death in childbirth was a major hazard for females. Although I think Neanderthals' brain size at childbirth was similar to that of modern-day babies - but later it grew faster.

Re:Bigger brains are not always better by Razengan on Wednesday March 29, 2017 @11:10AM (#13986987)
One has to wonder: if there were ever any other intelligent species (that we couldn't breed with) on this planet alongside us, then we probably wiped them out..
Re:Bigger brains are not always better by cauterized on Wednesday March 29, 2017 @12:09PM (#13987627)
Why would we necessarily be what wiped them out? Intelligent dinosaurs may have been wiped out by an asteroid/volcanic activity/climate disruption (or whatever the most current theory is).
Re:Bigger brains are not always better by sandworm101 on Wednesday March 29, 2017 @12:27PM (#13987841)
While they werent dumb lizards, i havent heard anyone claim dinos were dolphin or ape-smart. The brains were small and structured very differently than animals we today consider smart.
Re:Bigger brains are not always better by bonzini on Wednesday March 29, 2017 @02:47PM (#13989340)
Bird brains are also very different from mammal brains, yet corvids are considered to be one of the smartest species.
Re:Bigger brains are not always better by Razengan on Wednesday March 29, 2017 @12:36PM (#13987965)
Edited it a bit. :)

Were humans around at the time of the dinosaur extinction event?

Re:Bigger brains are not always better by return0 on Wednesday March 29, 2017 @06:15PM (#13991124)
idiocracy