That's a good point - especially important if someone's thinking about legislating a particular technology. On the other hand, maybe in this case it would be enough to legislate a requirement for openness of the protocol? I.e. whatever it is, if it has enough many users, it has to be fully available to third party integrations.
Re:Google Talk Is Being Discontinued
by TheSpiceIsLife on Saturday March 25, 2017 @03:01AM
(#13954442)
What about SMS? Everyone has it, it works, and is usually fairly instant. It's not very feature rich, but could there be an SMS 2.0 protocol that was backward compatible?
Re:Google Talk Is Being Discontinued
by hiptobecubic on Sunday March 26, 2017 @11:03AM
(#13961116)
Isn't this RCS?
This feels reminiscent of net neutrality and also general competition laws. I wonder if there's something in that which could be drawn upon?
Sounds like a straw man, just because South Korea made a mistake doesn't mean legislating a standard is bad.
That was interesting to google.
The first link I got: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/04/02/south_korea_to_depo...
In short, legislating a solution is a workaround that can turn out to be a huge detriment not too long down the road. I'm no libertarian, but it seems like a bad idea to me.