News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Intel Edison: Linux Maker Machine in a Matchbox by pjmlp on Tuesday March 21, 2017 @04:25AM (#13920596)
> idiotic yocto linux distribution

Never used it, but from what I see on embedded conference talks, it seems to be widely deployed.

Re:The Intel Edison: Linux Maker Machine in a Matchbox by rcxdude on Tuesday March 21, 2017 @06:14AM (#13920943)
Indeed. In terms of getting a consistent system where you can pull in packages and drivers from different places while still being able to tweak everything in an embedded system, it's the best option out there. Not that it's a great system (bitbake, the meta-build system, is a bit of an arcane horror. If I were to reinvent yocto, I would use something like nix, which bitbake sort-of tries to be like but fails).
Re:The Intel Edison: Linux Maker Machine in a Matchbox by makapuf on Tuesday March 21, 2017 @06:20AM (#13920963)
I can also mention buildroot [1] which seems to be a lighter, simpler project for this.

[1] https://buildroot.org/

Re:The Intel Edison: Linux Maker Machine in a Matchbox by rcxdude on Tuesday March 21, 2017 @06:27AM (#13920993)
Buildroot is harder to manage in my experience, yocto's layers are pretty killer in terms of seperating your code from vendor code. But yes, it's also an option.
Re:The Intel Edison: Linux Maker Machine in a Matchbox by skywal_l on Tuesday March 21, 2017 @08:00AM (#13921403)
How is it harder? It's a genuine question, not a rethorical one. Never used Yocto, but buildroot allows you to stack multiple filesystem layers on top the one produced by buildroot.