Re:Heroku CI in public beta
by nkristoffersen on Saturday March 18, 2017 @06:49PM
(#13903901)
I'm surprised people don't go all AWS with elastic beanstalk and cut out the expensive middleman.
Re:Heroku CI in public beta
by jacques_chester on Saturday March 18, 2017 @08:22PM
(#13904309)
Heroku seems like more of a value-add than Beanstalk, in my untutored opinion.
Again, disclosure, I work for a competitor.
If you were Heroku, how would you plug the hole of people running some parts of their deployments in AWS us-east-1 to save on their Heroku bill?
Maybe I just have the wrong idea, but I'm pretty sure the whole USP of Heroku is easy deployments without having to worry about Dev Ops and infrastructure. If you want to use AWS directly, that's great... but that's not the customer they're targeting.
Re:Heroku CI in public beta
by jacques_chester on Saturday March 18, 2017 @08:19PM
(#13904293)
I wouldn't, because that's mostly going to happen on larger accounts. I'd expect Salesforce to try and rope in those ones.
Insofar as you can decouple yourself from Heroku service offerings, you are able to decouple from Heroku.
Whether that's a full-service standalone platform like Cloud Foundry (partly inspired by, and partly sharing code with, Heroku), an IaaS-smoothing platform like Convox (founded by Heroku alumni), integrating some intermediate platforms like Deis or rolling your own with Kubernetes or Marathon.
Disclosure: I work for Pivotal, which sells a commercial distribution of Cloud Foundry. And I work in the Cloud R&D section on opensource bits of it. So I have a horse in this race.