dbbk

you're still the problem

This is a strange take, sorry, OKLCH is simply better and it's not that complicated to understand?

What do you mean copy? This is the copy, it's already behind Muse, Dots

This isn't the current policy

"(Because the agents were asked to find a way.)"

Yeah, this time

Did you try Claude mods?

Life is too short

But they have already done it. The updates are already in macOS and they have not negatively affected the UX.

Obviously?

That seems low

It wasn't the elders, it was Vercel itself which has a vested interest

Next.js is not a good fit for most applications. It honestly never has been. It has just been Vercel's relentless over-the-top marketing that has been trying to convince junior developers that it is.

Are people supposed to know this?

I have the Tanita RD-545 it's great

It's nice that he got work for four years, I guess

I think there is enormous untapped potential in AI working with MIDI in a DAW. And I don't really get the handwringing about it. Does that make it less creative? What about using synth presets? Or sample packs?

Not really confusing at all? Muse Spark it's the cheap Luna model. Wonder is the Sol model. Wonder Full is the Astra model.

They shouldn't be manually exporting web formats

Does this person know you can just... ship multiple formats? Just add avif

The article says he's losing money not making money

Interesting to note here that he's wildly unprofitable. "Beast Industries lost almost $60 million in 2024. Its Feastables snack line generated roughly $250 million in sales and more than $20 million in profit, while the media business produced similar sales and lost almost $80 million."

I remember <iframe seamless> being proposed many many years ago. I wonder why that was rejected.

I mean it's basically just producing a JSON schema to hand to the front-end renderer, I doubt it's any slower than returning a prose response

I hate to be rude but once again I am begging people to actually read the post. It is mentioned in the second paragraph that they are all verified bots.

Yes I am keen to have some kind of desktop robot I can talk to, as long as I can use ElevenLabs and ChatGPT

To boil it down I think it's basically one 'orchestrator' chat, so you don't manage multiple chats, and it proactively reaches out to you to update you on how your other chats are going. In the presentation they mentioned a "Chief of Staff".

It's not intended for coding.

No, they are right. This is basically just GOV.uk for America, and GOV.uk by all accounts is an incredible success.

It could have been worse, the Dots name was originally "o" and the introduction videos they have put out have been clearly dubbed over

Using advisors doesn't break anything

Hence why it is no longer dangerous, yes