News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google won’t be able to resist listening in on your conve... by KanyeBest on Friday March 17, 2017 @12:13PM (#13895126)
Let me be the devil's advocate for a moment:

Why is it a problem if Google knows more about you? Doesn't it just mean that you will be served content more relevant to you?

Re:Google won’t be able to resist listening in on your conve... by amelius on Friday March 17, 2017 @12:25PM (#13895256)
I guess it depends how valuable that service is.

Right now, I can't imagine that being served content "more relevant to me" is so valuable as to warrant a corporation systematically recording my doings. My current reaction is: I'm perfectly capable of finding relevant stuff on my own, thank you very much.

But I'd be happy to be proved wrong.

Re:Google won’t be able to resist listening in on your conve... by newsat13 on Friday March 17, 2017 @12:26PM (#13895265)
Google is doing good today but it could be owned by anyone tomorrow. Even ARM Holdings changed ownership just this last year because of market/politics. So, replace Google with your poison - China/Russia/Your neighbor/Some bank/Wallstreet etc. Note that this is different from theft and security because in Google's case you willingly gave away the data.
Re:Google won’t be able to resist listening in on your conve... by CaptSpify on Friday March 17, 2017 @01:57PM (#13896273)
Because, depending on your usage, Google can know more about you than anyone else, and can use that knowledge for much more sinister means than "serving more relevant content".
Re:Google won’t be able to resist listening in on your conve... by eveningcoffee on Friday March 17, 2017 @12:42PM (#13895426)
If by that you mean you will be more easily manipulated, then yes.

I do not want somebody else to choose what is relevant for me.