Re:Unsealed Documents Raise Questions on Monsanto Weed Killer
by 5mk on Wednesday March 15, 2017 @01:31PM
(#13877977)
Normally I would agree, but the lobbyist said that someone could "drink a whole quart of it" without any ill effect.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Unsealed Documents Raise Questions on Monsanto Weed Killer
by mikeyouse on Wednesday March 15, 2017 @01:38PM
(#13878071)
I get the sentiment, and it makes for good TV, but you could also drink a whole quart of urine without any ill effect and you can be sure I would decline that opportunity.
Re:Unsealed Documents Raise Questions on Monsanto Weed Killer
by larsiusprime on Wednesday March 15, 2017 @01:48PM
(#13878176)
Yeah, but if you JUST SAID you would be perfectly willing to do so to make a point, it (rightly) damages your credibility.
Re:Unsealed Documents Raise Questions on Monsanto Weed Killer
by exolymph on Wednesday March 15, 2017 @02:59PM
(#13878763)
You're not a urine lobbyist, though, are you?
Re:Unsealed Documents Raise Questions on Monsanto Weed Killer
by searine on Wednesday March 15, 2017 @01:38PM
(#13878069)
I could drink a glass of urine without any ill effect.
That doesn't mean I am waiting beside the urinal with my coffee cup ready.
Re:Unsealed Documents Raise Questions on Monsanto Weed Killer
by mikeyouse on Wednesday March 15, 2017 @01:39PM
(#13878086)
Lol, I posted the same thing at nearly the exact same time.. amusing how the mind converges on certain things when you think of "Gross things to drink".
Re:Unsealed Documents Raise Questions on Monsanto Weed Killer
by coolgeek on Saturday March 18, 2017 @07:11PM
(#13903994)
You're not trying to force your urine into substantial parts of the food chain.
And you're not lobbying (paying off governments at state and federal levels) to prevent that from showing up on food labels.
All of which Monsanto is trying to do with their products.