Re:SEC Rejects Rule Change for Bitcoin Exchange-Traded Fund ...
by chillacy on Friday March 10, 2017 @05:39PM
(#13842790)
What's stopping him from doing a similar thing by selling deep OOTM options off of money he borrows on his margin account at any other broker?
Re:SEC Rejects Rule Change for Bitcoin Exchange-Traded Fund ...
by vostok on Friday March 10, 2017 @05:48PM
(#13842841)
Deep out of the money options have optionality whereas BitMex contracts are delta 1 products. They have literally nothing in common. The relevant difference in this case is that the option caps your upside.
Re:SEC Rejects Rule Change for Bitcoin Exchange-Traded Fund ...
by chillacy on Saturday March 11, 2017 @05:09AM
(#13844979)
My point is that risky financial plays are still possible even in the SEC regulated market. Maybe I misunderstood the parent poster though.
Re:SEC Rejects Rule Change for Bitcoin Exchange-Traded Fund ...
by zeusk on Sunday March 12, 2017 @03:13AM
(#13849596)
As per SEC requirements, brokers are required to quiz you to makes sure you understand the risks involved in trading derivatives.
Furthermore, selling naked options (Level 3 access) without hedging or verticals requires certain capital and margin requirements, I do not think it is easily possible to get 50x levered in options alone - you'd probably need /ES futures for that.
This is partly why SEC wants underlying to be regulated.