News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Introducing the Invisible reCAPTCHA by ge96 on Thursday March 09, 2017 @09:03AM (#13829275)
I wonder about the error-check thing. If at least one paid employee had to enter a first-set of data that was 'absolutely correct' before being seen by multiple people online which then 'solidifies' the correct responses. I briefly read about this somewhere but still not sure. I mean it does obviously work in the sense of entering something blatantly not correct is flagged.
Re:Introducing the Invisible reCAPTCHA by ceejayoz on Thursday March 09, 2017 @09:05AM (#13829291)
Probably no need to have someone seed it. You just show the same image to a thousand people, and if 900 of them answer it one way that's almost certainly the correct answer.
Re:Introducing the Invisible reCAPTCHA by ge96 on Thursday March 09, 2017 @06:59PM (#13835053)
Interesting. I'm inclined to think that this is not good. But it makes sense consensus, just seems to me if everyone is wrong. But the quality-check (seed guy) could be wrong as well.