News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on To fix L.A.'s traffic, we need tolls. Parent comment

Re:To fix L.A.'s traffic, we need tolls by titzer on Wednesday March 08, 2017 @03:40AM (#13818904)
> The greater LA as a whole is also pretty dense, denser than NY metro area.

Sorry, this is not even close. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_cities_b...

There are many ranking areas in NYC in the top 25, and only a few from LA. NYC overall is ranked #6! Los Angeles doesn't even place in the top 130.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:To fix L.A.'s traffic, we need tolls by erispoe on Wednesday March 08, 2017 @12:26PM (#13821733)
I said greater LA, whereby, to be precise, I meant Los Angeles metro area. The density of LA metro is 2,702.5ppl/km2, compared to 2,053.6ppl/km2 for NY metro. LA metro is denser by a good margin.

NY metro area includes a lot of very sparse suburbs. LA is mildly dense all over.

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_urban_ar...

http://www2.census.gov/geo/docs/reference/ua/ua_list_all.txt

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:To fix L.A.'s traffic, we need tolls by jmchuster on Wednesday March 08, 2017 @10:39AM (#13820934)
You're not really looking at the right information there. Your top 5 cities are in single-digit km^2. For comparison, Yorkville, at 1.29 km^2, in the Upper East Side of Manhattan, has 60,349 persons/km^2.
[ Parent | on HN ]