News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Economics of Status (2006) by yodon on Sunday March 05, 2017 @08:18PM (#13800041)
I'm sorry to call you out on this, but when I click on the link for your username, I see lots of info you've listed to communicate your status as a successful and accomplished member of the tech community. Presumably that info is there because you think it is relevant and of interest to the technology people here on HN.

Oh, and yes, if you or someone else clicks on both our links you'll see that you have far more karma here than I do, suggesting that perhaps your opinion on these matters should be valued over mine, and/or that you can both dish out and weather down-votes more than I can, both because of your higher status here.

[edit: slight grammar tweak for clarity]

Re:The Economics of Status (2006) by dang on Monday March 06, 2017 @11:54AM (#13803911)
That crosses into personal attack and is not allowed. Your account doesn't seem to have a history of doing this on HN, so I'm going to put it down to the weird sort of pothole in the road that occasionally leads to a near-collision. But please don't do it again. paulsutter has been a great HN contributor for years and did not deserve this.

We detached this subthread from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13799970 and marked it off-topic.

Re:The Economics of Status (2006) by paulsutter on Sunday March 05, 2017 @09:48PM (#13800354)
Ok then, I just deleted my bio, if that helps.

As for HN points, that just indicates procrastination (spending too much time on HN).

Re:The Economics of Status (2006) by cortesoft on Sunday March 05, 2017 @10:47PM (#13800552)
Well, now you are trying to increase your status as someone who doesn't care about status. The fact that you felt it worthwhile to delete your bio, just to prove to some random internet stranger that you don't care about status, clearly shows that you care.

It is ok to care about how others perceive you. We are social creatures, and we care about what others think. That isn't a bad thing.

Re:The Economics of Status (2006) by paulsutter on Sunday March 05, 2017 @11:13PM (#13800652)
I assure you I'm a nerd with no social standing whatsoever, and I'm almost flattered to be considered otherwise here in this thread.

And yes we're social creatures, and we all want to be understood and appreciated. But that's quite a different thing from pursuing social status.

Re:The Economics of Status (2006) by cortesoft on Monday March 06, 2017 @04:24PM (#13806189)
I don't think it IS different.... being 'understood and appreciated' is exactly what social status is.
Re:The Economics of Status (2006) by paulsutter on Tuesday March 07, 2017 @12:50PM (#13812719)
No, social status is a zero sum /ranking/ of individuals and inherently competitive.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_status

Re:The Economics of Status (2006) by dang on Monday March 06, 2017 @11:55AM (#13803921)
> Ok then, I just deleted my bio, if that helps.

Oh no! please put it back. The value to other HN users far exceeds the cost of a weird personal snipe, uncalled-for though it was.

Re:The Economics of Status (2006) by MegaButts on Sunday March 05, 2017 @08:32PM (#13800101)
Do you really think he's trying to sell himself as elite or just mention his past job roles? Sometimes that context can be useful, especially if you want to email him (which he includes).

I realize the point you're trying to make. I'm just not sure it's applicable here.

Re:The Economics of Status (2006) by icebraining on Monday March 06, 2017 @08:42AM (#13802543)
That's the point: it's incorrect to dismiss status seeking as something only aspiring elites do. There's status in every group.
Re:The Economics of Status (2006) by MegaButts on Monday March 06, 2017 @12:21PM (#13804200)
I understand that people can seek status in every group. But that doesn't mean that talking about your career, in a status section that very few people bother to check, is the same as gloating.

If OP prefaced every comment with "by the way, I was the founder of such-and-such which was acquired" and then went on to discuss something completely different, THAT would be status seeking. Instead, it was a very short, objective summary of his career in perhaps a dozen words.

My point is simple: not everybody is status seeking all the time. Sometimes people are just trying to communicate with no ulterior motive.