Re:94-year-old Lithium-Ion Battery Inventor Introduces Solid...
by burntwater on Friday March 03, 2017 @03:52PM
(#13786398)
You can definitely buy more rugged phones. Often they lag behind in specs compared to popular flagship models, but they're not bad. For instance, I currently use a CAT S60 phone: http://www.catphones.com/en-gb/phones/s60-smartphone
After a normal day of use I'll still have 60% of battery life. It's normally water resistant down to 6 feet for 30 minutes, flipping two switches makes it water resistant down to 15 feet for 30 minutes (and it even comes with a "drying" app that helps it to dry faster by, I think, vibrating the speakers.)
This particular phone comes with FLIR imaging, which probably isn't useful to the general population...
Re:94-year-old Lithium-Ion Battery Inventor Introduces Solid...
by zer0t3ch on Friday March 03, 2017 @09:38PM
(#13788830)
That's fucking cool. Is that the same "CAT" that makes things like bulldozers and scoops?
Re:94-year-old Lithium-Ion Battery Inventor Introduces Solid...
by burntwater on Saturday March 04, 2017 @02:27AM
(#13789806)
It's the same CAT brand, yes, but the phone itself is developed by I think a British company.
Re:94-year-old Lithium-Ion Battery Inventor Introduces Solid...
by zer0t3ch on Saturday March 04, 2017 @05:06PM
(#13793159)
Cool. If I had the money, that would totally be my next phone.
Re:94-year-old Lithium-Ion Battery Inventor Introduces Solid...
by Namrog84 on Friday March 03, 2017 @03:08PM
(#13785898)
Not many phones do.
But a few have done what you suggest. At least slightly. The Galaxy s6 came in an active version that had like 30% more battery and better water resistance and a slightly tougher default shell.
I don't know how their sales were for the 2 models but I hope they were good enough to continue the trend
Irks me that not one single phone manufacturer dares to ship a product as indestructible as an iphone in an Otterbox. Sure it would be the clunkiest handset in the store, but compare it to other phones + case, there's room to make a superior final product. But no. Apple keeps shaving millimeters and Otterbox keeps slathering them back on.