News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Visual Studio Code 1.10 by inertial on Thursday March 02, 2017 @02:02AM (#13772119)
Kinda surprised that every version bump gets a lot of love on HN [1].

How does it compare in terms of memory usage w.r.t sublime ? I've a sublime project open for months that has never had any impact on system performance and it stays within 70MB RAM. Is VS Code even close ?

[1] https://hn.algolia.com/?query=visual%20studio%20code&sort=by...

Re:Visual Studio Code 1.10 by anilgulecha on Thursday March 02, 2017 @02:41AM (#13772334)
It's because of the non-fluffy release posts.

They have detailed list of new features, with good GIF demos of new features. How can one not like a release post like that?

Re:Visual Studio Code 1.10 by SiVal on Thursday March 02, 2017 @03:15AM (#13772511)
Kinda surprised that every version bump gets a lot of love on HN

I'm glad it does. Each version bump, I come over the HN to check out what people have to say. It's an extremely useful tool to me and is developing rapidly. I'm using it, but I don't have as much time as I'd like to study it, so I glance through the comments to see if someone mentions something I'm not aware of that I should know.

I could get more about the product specifically from a good VSCode forum, but they don't seem to have one. A Github Issues page is not a proper user forum. (Maybe they have one now--as I said, I don't keep up as well as I'd like.)

But HN will tell me things about VSCode in a larger context, so I would probably want to keep reading comments here even if VSCode had a proper user forum.

Re:Visual Studio Code 1.10 by reaktivo on Thursday March 02, 2017 @05:52AM (#13773158)
For reference, I usually get 45 - 50MB ram usage on VS Code.
Re:Visual Studio Code 1.10 by tutanchamun on Thursday March 02, 2017 @06:29AM (#13773319)
On what operating system and with how many tabs open if I might ask? With 6 tabs open (5 html files, 1 css file) and two extensions installed I get ~230 MB on Windows.
Re:Visual Studio Code 1.10 by reaktivo on Thursday March 02, 2017 @09:46AM (#13774286)
On macOS, 9 tabs (js), 8 extensions. 55MB
Re:Visual Studio Code 1.10 by tutanchamun on Thursday March 02, 2017 @10:02AM (#13774425)
Thanks. Is unix (maybe specifically MacOS) just that more efficient, or doesn't it count multiple processes?
Re:Visual Studio Code 1.10 by kwood on Thursday March 02, 2017 @11:24AM (#13775299)
It's not, OP didn't count the other processes in (they are listed seperatly in Activity Monitor). VSCode needs roughly the same amount of RAM on macOS.