Re:In Video, Uber CEO Argues with Driver Over Falling Fares
by iraphael on Tuesday February 28, 2017 @05:12PM
(#13758638)
that's for use of a recording in court, not sure it applies to this situation
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:In Video, Uber CEO Argues with Driver Over Falling Fares
by caffeinewriter on Tuesday February 28, 2017 @05:18PM
(#13758692)
What? No.
> The statute applies to "confidential communications" -- i.e., conversations in which one of the parties has an objectively reasonable expectation that no one is listening in or overhearing the conversation. See Flanagan v. Flanagan, 41 P.3d 575, 576-77, 578-82 (Cal. 2002). A California appellate court has ruled that this statute applies to the use of hidden video cameras to record conversations as well. See California v. Gibbons, 215 Cal. App. 3d 1204 (Cal Ct. App. 1989).
If there's a reasonable expectation of privacy, all parties must consent to the recording.