Re:In Video, Uber CEO Argues with Driver Over Falling Fares
by oculusthrift on Tuesday February 28, 2017 @04:58PM
(#13758479)
look up 2 party consent laws in California.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:In Video, Uber CEO Argues with Driver Over Falling Fares
by TheseDays888 on Tuesday February 28, 2017 @05:34PM
(#13758864)
"Here in London..."
Not sure referring to California laws follows here. It's for a different reason.
Re:In Video, Uber CEO Argues with Driver Over Falling Fares
by iraphael on Tuesday February 28, 2017 @05:12PM
(#13758638)
that's for use of a recording in court, not sure it applies to this situation
Re:In Video, Uber CEO Argues with Driver Over Falling Fares
by caffeinewriter on Tuesday February 28, 2017 @05:18PM
(#13758692)
What? No.
> The statute applies to "confidential communications" -- i.e., conversations in which one of the parties has an objectively reasonable expectation that no one is listening in or overhearing the conversation. See Flanagan v. Flanagan, 41 P.3d 575, 576-77, 578-82 (Cal. 2002). A California appellate court has ruled that this statute applies to the use of hidden video cameras to record conversations as well. See California v. Gibbons, 215 Cal. App. 3d 1204 (Cal Ct. App. 1989).
If there's a reasonable expectation of privacy, all parties must consent to the recording.