News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Mozilla Acquires Pocket by yellowapple on Monday February 27, 2017 @02:57PM (#13747373)
My own reason for disliking it was that it's a closed-source piece of an otherwise-FOSS browser. Hopefully this acquisition means a change for the better on that front.
Re:Mozilla Acquires Pocket by Jach on Monday February 27, 2017 @03:42PM (#13747778)
I always thought that complaint was kind of odd. It's essentially the same as their Search input. Google/Yahoo/etc. are proprietary but Firefox lets you talk to them directly from their browser. Similarly, the code for the Pocket button (component) for where it handles the user clicking the button, along with what it does to talk to the Pocket server, was all in the open and if you build from source you could just remove that entirely. I was more against it for the same reasons I'm against any UI 'upgrades' when I upgrade the browser. The "share this page" button that suddenly appeared annoys me equally as much. Fortunately I can just remove it from the menu but I'd rather Mozilla didn't mess with my UI customization. (I don't know what I'm going to do when I can't use treestyle tabs anymore. I guess move to Pale Moon.)
Re:Mozilla Acquires Pocket by pseudalopex on Monday February 27, 2017 @05:12PM (#13748853)
Mozilla replaced Reading List (which was client-side encrypted and theoretically self-hostable) with Pocket (which is neither). Search engines need search terms to function; Pocket uses user data to support a particular business model.
Re:Mozilla Acquires Pocket by dredmorbius on Monday February 27, 2017 @11:36PM (#13751227)
Reading list was seriously underfeatured.

Pocket is now Free Software, which might make those elements from RL you liked possible again.

Re:Mozilla Acquires Pocket by pseudalopex on Tuesday February 28, 2017 @02:12PM (#13756803)
Reading List was still in development when it was canceled. Anyone who preferred Pocket was free to install it.

Continuing the current revenue model and supporting Context Graph seem at odds with improving user privacy. Pocket isn't now Free Software, but hopefully it will be feasible to self-host whenever they do release the source.

Re:Mozilla Acquires Pocket by yellowapple on Monday February 27, 2017 @07:47PM (#13750129)
"I don't know what I'm going to do when I can't use treestyle tabs anymore. I guess move to Pale Moon."

I hear ya, being in a similar boat. My hope is that Netsurf ends up being a decent contender here by the time Mozilla kills XUL. Else, hopefully TST will indeed be made possible with Firefox-specific WebExtension APIs.

Re:Mozilla Acquires Pocket by callahad on Monday February 27, 2017 @08:24PM (#13750331)
TST will be possible with WebExtensions. For hard evidence, even the Add-Ons Engineering Manager is working on his own, personal vertical tabs webextension to suss out what APIs we need: https://github.com/andymckay/sidebar-tabs

We may not land everything we need by the time Firefox 57 releases, but we'll get there. If we miss, you have options: you can decamp to Firefox ESR for a few months, where TST will keep working, or someone could theoretically convert TST to a WebExtension Experiment which would work on DevEdition and Nightly builds of Firefox.

Re:Mozilla Acquires Pocket by dredmorbius on Monday February 27, 2017 @11:41PM (#13751245)
That's very good news. TST is one of the few things that makes web browsing even vaguely viable these days.

I've noticed (on the rare instances I'm on desktop, mostly Mac these days) that Vimperator is also borked (only parts of it seem to be functioning). That's another lifesaver to me, and whatever it takes for it to come back to life and/or an alternative to provide effectively similar functionality ... would be peachy.

If I can lure you to another bit of developer / user advocacy, a bit from about 3 years ago on the content management problem:

https://www.reddit.com/r/dredmorbius/comments/256lxu/tabbed_...

Re:Mozilla Acquires Pocket by im3w1l on Tuesday February 28, 2017 @12:24AM (#13751475)
The search plugin feature is an open standard. Anyone can create their own search engine and plugin for it.
Re:Mozilla Acquires Pocket by mintplant on Monday February 27, 2017 @03:24PM (#13747601)
Pocket will become FOSS, so yes. Follow [0] for status updates.

[0] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=open-pocket

Re:Mozilla Acquires Pocket by JustSomeNobody on Monday February 27, 2017 @04:08PM (#13748072)
So FOSS should be pure?
Re:Mozilla Acquires Pocket by yellowapple on Monday February 27, 2017 @07:43PM (#13750109)
Ideally, yes. I can understand some exceptions there to get, say, driver/firmware support for FOSS-unfriendly hardware, but integrating Pocket - at the time - was not such a situation.

Now there's a different, much better story.