Re:Firefox 57 as the first release where only WebExtensions ...
by pvg on Sunday February 19, 2017 @02:57AM
(#13678650)
So, like https://www.chromium.org/Home
Personally, I'd at definitely consider using Jesus on a popsicle, if the opportunity arose, just to see what it's like. Not that it has so far, sadly.
Re:Firefox 57 as the first release where only WebExtensions ...
by josteink on Sunday February 19, 2017 @04:27AM
(#13678890)
Chromium still requires you to log into a google account and share your private data with google to sync.
Definitely not an option.
Re:Firefox 57 as the first release where only WebExtensions ...
by pvg on Sunday February 19, 2017 @06:06AM
(#13679159)
To sync what? I use Chrome and never log into a non-web google account. In fact, I'm able to browse the web without 'syncing' anything.
Re:Firefox 57 as the first release where only WebExtensions ...
by josteink on Sunday February 19, 2017 @07:40AM
(#13679414)
Bookmarks, history, passwords etc.
I don't want to give those to google. Is that unreasonable?
It may be Jesus on a popsicle, but I'm not going to trust something distributed via drive-by-installers, marketed through SPAM and made by the world's biggest data-hoarder and privacy-invader no matter what.
It's adware/malware short and simple.
Make it 100% FOSS. Remove any technical connection to Google. Don't require Google-logon to sync. Only distribute it to users who actually asked to have it installed. Etc etc.
At that point I might consider starting trusting it. Not before.