Re:Oracle refuses to accept pro-Google “fair use” verdict in...
by empath75 on Saturday February 11, 2017 @03:27PM
(#13624617)
Growth rate is a nonsense metric. If you're starting from nothing and invest a shitload of money in sales you'll have an amazing growth rate. IBM and Oracle are both way behind azure, google and aws.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Oracle refuses to accept pro-Google “fair use” verdict in...
by parthdesai on Saturday February 11, 2017 @06:56PM
(#13625648)
I have a friend who works at IBM he tells me that IBM uses Google cloud for some of their stuff. The irony when you are a cloud provider but use another service.
Re:Oracle refuses to accept pro-Google “fair use” verdict in...
by yellowapple on Saturday February 11, 2017 @07:36PM
(#13625816)
I mean, that in and of itself ain't really ironic. Lots of cloud providers out there just resell abstractions around / improvements upon other cloud providers. Cloud66 is one with which I'm familiar; their whole business model revolves around wrapping AWS with CloudFoundry-like deployment mechanisms specifically for Ruby codebases (and Docker containers, but I never interacted with them in that capacity).
Re:Oracle refuses to accept pro-Google “fair use” verdict in...
by emmelaich on Sunday February 12, 2017 @01:12AM
(#13627054)
Yes, and note that IBM do a lot of Oracle support.
Re:Oracle refuses to accept pro-Google “fair use” verdict in...
by bogomipz on Saturday February 11, 2017 @09:19PM
(#13626262)
>"The figures come even though--as mentioned in the earnings report headline--Oracle's SaaS/PaaS revenue rose 77% in dollars and 79% in CC, totaling $798 million "
$800 million from their cloud offering in a single quarter is nonsense?
Re:Oracle refuses to accept pro-Google “fair use” verdict in...
by chinhodado on Sunday February 12, 2017 @12:09AM
(#13626863)
Maybe not, but that number doesn't tell the whole story. This is revenue. How much are they spending on R&D, infrastructure, marketing, etc. for their cloud business? How fast is that spending's growth in relative to the revenue?