News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Join GitLab's March Issue Bash by jasim on Friday February 10, 2017 @11:34AM (#13616620)
I'd love to know what the magic recipe that GitLab uses to be so prominently in-your-face at all times on HN.
Re:Join GitLab's March Issue Bash by Latty on Friday February 10, 2017 @12:34PM (#13617163)
It feels pretty obvious to me - it's a well managed, useful product that offers a hosted version for free for any use, and it's truly universal - there aren't many developers who don't want source code control.

There is also the 'FOSS version of a popular proprietary thing' angle and the openness of the project that means there is more news about it to post.

In general, it feels pretty natural to me it would get posted about a lot, and upvoted a lot.

Re:Join GitLab's March Issue Bash by sytse on Friday February 10, 2017 @05:29PM (#13619486)
Thanks, but I agree with the sentiment that it we're a lot of HN these days, I can see people getting tired of it.

Frankly, I didn't expect the issue bash to get upvoted. We have our postmortem coming in a few minutes. I'm sure that will be much discussed here. We considered postponing that post but we promised it for this week and feel like we owe it to our users.

I've instructed all our people not to submit articles to HN but we can't prevent others from posting.

Re:Join GitLab's March Issue Bash by Perihelion on Friday February 10, 2017 @11:34AM (#13616627)
We've actually been trying to back off of HN, but the community posts just about anything that appears on our blog.
Re:Join GitLab's March Issue Bash by kneath on Friday February 10, 2017 @11:41AM (#13616701)
Re:Join GitLab's March Issue Bash by dang on Friday February 10, 2017 @04:01PM (#13618843)
If you're implying that we did something to boost this post because Gitlab is a YC startup, we didn't. Matter of fact we penalized it as unsubstantive.

There's a standard moderation penalty for submissions whose only content is rallying users to some cause or event, since (however good the cause) that isn't intellectually interesting.

Re:Join GitLab's March Issue Bash by sytse on Friday February 10, 2017 @05:30PM (#13619493)
Thanks for giving it a penalty, I agree it isn't intellectually interesting and it doesn't belong on the HN frontpage.
Re:Join GitLab's March Issue Bash by minimaxir on Friday February 10, 2017 @11:46AM (#13616747)
Other replies are implying vote rigging/bias. IMO, that's not the case in this instance, there are other terms which reliably get a lot of upvotes just because they are in the headline. (namely, Rust and Machine Learning)
Re:Join GitLab's March Issue Bash by amlozano on Friday February 10, 2017 @11:38AM (#13616666)
Because despite all the hate, GitLab is still pretty awesome to have.
Re:Join GitLab's March Issue Bash by ergo14 on Friday February 10, 2017 @12:36PM (#13617181)
They are YC company.
Re:Join GitLab's March Issue Bash by jasim on Friday February 10, 2017 @11:44AM (#13616721)
Regret posting this. Sorry!
Re:Join GitLab's March Issue Bash by sytse on Saturday February 11, 2017 @10:43AM (#13623074)
No problem, I agree with the sentiment expressed.
Re:Join GitLab's March Issue Bash by shimon_e on Friday February 10, 2017 @12:44PM (#13617266)
I'm waiting for them to release a backup runner that tests your backups.