Re:10GHz at under 1V by 2005 - The future of Intel’s manufac...
by unixhero on Wednesday February 08, 2017 @03:35AM
(#13596775)
Thank you for your synaptic sugar this morning. It saved an incredibly boring meeting during a long track implementation project.
Re:10GHz at under 1V by 2005 - The future of Intel’s manufac...
by Dylan16807 on Wednesday February 08, 2017 @05:53AM
(#13597331)
It's very easy to design a CPU such that signals do not have to cross it in one cycle. The speed of light is unlikely to ever cap the speed of a CMOS processor.
Because of the special relativity theory nothing including electrical current can transmit information faster than the speed of light (c = 3*10^10 cm/s). So if maximum size dimension of your CPU is say 2cm (I'm ignoring that they actually can have multiple smaller cores), then the maximum physically achievable frequency is upper bounded by size/c = 15 GHz.
Although it has not been reached yet, it has the same order of magnitude as the record frequencies achieved by overclockers using liquid nitrogen cooling (something a little below 9 GHz). Also it shows that reducing transistor size and as a consequence overall CPU size increases maximum physically allowed frequency.