News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Amicus brief on behalf of 97 tech companies by skrowl on Monday February 06, 2017 @10:33AM (#13580326)
This argument is FUD.

Saudi Arabia, UAE, etc weren't "banned" because they share a great deal of information with us about people seeking entry into our country. The 7 "banned" countries do not. It's that simple.

It's about information exchange. We can't get enough info from the 7 "banned" countries to make informed pass/fail decisions about their travelers.

Re:Amicus brief on behalf of 97 tech companies by hvo on Monday February 06, 2017 @11:23AM (#13580929)
Iraq, where US contributed to the establishment of the present regime and where some remaining American soldiers are still there, does not share information with you? Seriously.

If sharing information with you as you said here is the most important yardstick,rather than subtle religion test,why is North Korea is not on the list?

Re:Amicus brief on behalf of 97 tech companies by ConfuciusSay02 on Monday February 06, 2017 @04:56PM (#13584574)
Are you suggesting when Obama added Iraq to the list he was lying about what information they share?

North Korea is not on the list because literally nobody is travelling from North Korea to the United States.

Re:Amicus brief on behalf of 97 tech companies by jakelazaroff on Tuesday February 07, 2017 @02:06AM (#13587690)
No, GP is suggesting that "sharing information about people seeking to enter our country" is not the reason any of these countries were in- or excluded from this list.