Wow, I would have guessed the opposite. Devil Wears Prada? Mean Girls?
Oh well, that's what I get for forming opinions without real-life evidence.
This is pretty tiny, by Internet messageboard standards.
Even a tiny subreddit has tens of thousands of users, and "smaller" subs have over a hundred thousand.
I suspect that your good experience had more to do with the small number of people than the topic or demographics.
There seems to be a magic threshold when the user base size crosses it and suddenly people are more disruptive. Based on my observation of a few online groups I've participated in.
If you want the results of that experiment, you'll find it in the conventional wisdom among reddit moderators and dedicated users. Subs with under 10,000 subscribed users are not only good interpersonally, the content of the subreddit is in it's heyday. If the userbase balloons, or the content quality nosedives, then you get bad interpersonal interaction.
I ultimately had to take to boards down due to waning interest in the band and the continuing attention cost of keeping the server and message board software up to date.
I'm no longer active on staff duties but the site is going strong so I'm guessing we did something right.
Those guys and the DAD clan from TFC (now disbanded) had some of the greatest mods. They kept the places in check but they had a sense of humor about it.
[1] - http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/tl-community/17883-tlnet-ten...
[2] - http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/TeamLiquid.net_Staff
What where some of the reasons you would get sued?
It's weird that people thought you could just bolt comments onto a webpage without problems, because we had all those years of Usenet to show that it wasn't that easy.
edit: before the parent comment was edited, the most charitable reading of the comment was that internet commenting systems have a net negative effect on humanity
Dick picks, on the other hand, are tedious but not inherently bad.
It's basically the forum for all of Australia. They seem to have found the perfect balance between moderation and creating a good culture.
Still they have big problems with spam, ddos attacks and moderator turnover and that is after they delegate the bigger problems to /b to be mostly ignored.
Also, racism and doxxing are not comparable at all.
Surely some forum hosts will desire to serve those users who desire strong moderation, and for these forum hosts, not censoring or moderating isn't a solution.
Running a large message board network is one of the worst experiences I have ever had. You are constantly wasting time moderating people, blocking people, recalculating algorithms, dealing with attacks and explaining to the police you don't have the IP address in question. Every large message board I have developed or managed revolted or sued us ([1][2] random example revolts). One of the largest being niketalk.com. THIS, while making NO MONEY. Users that use generic message boards are extremely hostile towards ads and refuse to pay for anything. EVERYTHING done by the moderators is overblown and people working there are publicly quartered.
Yeah no thanks. I would have removed the boards too - then got a coffee.
[1] http://mashable.com/2010/08/30/users-revolt-against-new-digg...
[2] https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/jul/07/reddit-re...