News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Snap Inc. S-1 by vineetch on Thursday February 02, 2017 @04:53PM (#13555094)
They spent $890,339 on security for Evan Spiegel in 2016? Why does he need that much security? Who is trying to hurt him?
Re:Snap Inc. S-1 by melvinmt on Thursday February 02, 2017 @05:31PM (#13555509)
"When Spiegel travels between his company's scattered outposts, he normally has a Range Rover with a private driver transport him from building to building. The former employee described it like the president arriving: a black car would pull up and Spiegel would hurriedly pop out with his security detail."

http://www.businessinsider.com/what-its-like-to-work-at-snap...

Re:Snap Inc. S-1 by trendia on Thursday February 02, 2017 @04:58PM (#13555152)
According to Wikipedia, he has $2b in wealth [0]. I have no idea whether $900,000 / year is high or low for someone of that net worth.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evan_Spiegel#Personal_life

Re:Snap Inc. S-1 by yggda on Thursday February 02, 2017 @05:25PM (#13555442)
Re:Snap Inc. S-1 by kgwgk on Thursday February 02, 2017 @05:53PM (#13555733)
And Facebook spends $5mn on security for its CEO and $1m for its CFO.

http://nypost.com/2016/04/28/facebook-has-spent-14-5m-on-zuc...

Re:Snap Inc. S-1 by giarc on Thursday February 02, 2017 @10:17PM (#13557378)
I would say that Zuckerberg is much more recognizable than Spiegel. Likely gets mobbed where ever he goes.
Re:Snap Inc. S-1 by calbear81 on Friday February 03, 2017 @12:15PM (#13561361)
You forget to Spiegel is engaged to Miranda Kerr, supermodel and is likely to be super visible outside of work.
Re:Snap Inc. S-1 by wayne on Friday February 03, 2017 @01:27AM (#13558164)
$1.3M for its COO (Sheryl Sandberg), not CFO.
Re:Snap Inc. S-1 by kgwgk on Friday February 03, 2017 @05:09AM (#13558858)
True, sloppy copying. I guess the CFO is safe as long as the stock performs well :-)
Re:Snap Inc. S-1 by rwmj on Thursday February 02, 2017 @05:06PM (#13555240)
Johnny Depp spends "Over $150,000/month on full-time security for his children" according to current revelations. So $900K/year for someone who's not very famous isn't unreasonable I suppose.
Re:Snap Inc. S-1 by jonknee on Thursday February 02, 2017 @05:11PM (#13555299)
Johnny Depp is also in a huge financial hole for irresponsible spending... Not a comparison.
Re:Snap Inc. S-1 by discodave on Thursday February 02, 2017 @08:28PM (#13556868)
It's easy to work out the cost of full time security. Lets say you need 2 people on rotation, they do 12 hours per day each (doable because they get to relax while client is at home etc.) then multiply by a reasonable salary for skilled labor like 70k then you get to 140k per year per person easily.
Re:Snap Inc. S-1 by skuhn on Thursday February 02, 2017 @05:23PM (#13555421)
$890k seems high in that for the previous year it was only $328k. I guess they had to triple everything for BCP.
Re:Snap Inc. S-1 by ladybro on Thursday February 02, 2017 @06:00PM (#13555794)
Lots of Venice Beach locals are not happy that Snap is buying up prime property / increasing rents / bringing in yuppies etc. I wouldn't be surprised if he's received threats and is most focused on security while in and around the office.
Re:Snap Inc. S-1 by xxpor on Thursday February 02, 2017 @07:27PM (#13556481)
Could also be that he's married to Miranda Kerr, so they have to deal with paparazzi
Re:Snap Inc. S-1 by haldean on Thursday February 02, 2017 @05:04PM (#13555211)
A lot of people want to punch that dude.
Re:Snap Inc. S-1 by quickben on Thursday February 02, 2017 @05:40PM (#13555616)
Why?
Re:Snap Inc. S-1 by bduerst on Thursday February 02, 2017 @07:26PM (#13556476)
He's your typical unfiltered founder, which inevitably gets on people's nerves:

http://i.imgur.com/4h2Y1Uv.png

http://i.imgur.com/LPtAqDW.png

Re:Snap Inc. S-1 by spbaar on Friday February 03, 2017 @02:20AM (#13558325)
If making fun of windows phone is wrong I don't want to be right.
Re:Snap Inc. S-1 by gragas on Thursday February 02, 2017 @11:55PM (#13557784)
Those seem like normal things to say. He's obviously being facetious.
Re:Snap Inc. S-1 by dreaminvm on Thursday February 02, 2017 @05:19PM (#13555382)
If Snap Inc. IPOs at their expected 25B value, Spiegel will be valued at nearly 5 billion (21% ownership), so ~1 million in security per year is not too far-fetched.
Re:Snap Inc. S-1 by fudged71 on Thursday February 02, 2017 @05:42PM (#13555635)
Why not just kidnapping insurance?
Re:Snap Inc. S-1 by twinkletwinkle on Thursday February 02, 2017 @05:48PM (#13555696)
Maybe he doesn't want to be kidnapped in the first place...
Re:Snap Inc. S-1 by dreaminvm on Thursday February 02, 2017 @05:52PM (#13555722)
Because he is not the most likable CEO and not everyone is looking for a payday.

I am merely pointing out that his security costs are negligible to him/Snap Inc based on their valuation.

Re:Snap Inc. S-1 by bduerst on Thursday February 02, 2017 @07:20PM (#13556430)
Why not both?

Imagine the insurance premiums on that much wealth, without any security.

Re:Snap Inc. S-1 by querulous on Thursday February 02, 2017 @04:59PM (#13555170)
ego