News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Snap Inc. S-1. Parent comment

Re:Snap Inc. S-1 by fudged71 on Thursday February 02, 2017 @05:42PM (#13555635)
Why not just kidnapping insurance?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Snap Inc. S-1 by twinkletwinkle on Thursday February 02, 2017 @05:48PM (#13555696)
Maybe he doesn't want to be kidnapped in the first place...
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Snap Inc. S-1 by dreaminvm on Thursday February 02, 2017 @05:52PM (#13555722)
Because he is not the most likable CEO and not everyone is looking for a payday.

I am merely pointing out that his security costs are negligible to him/Snap Inc based on their valuation.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Snap Inc. S-1 by bduerst on Thursday February 02, 2017 @07:20PM (#13556430)
Why not both?

Imagine the insurance premiums on that much wealth, without any security.

[ Parent | on HN ]