News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Paralyzed man regains use of arms and hands after experim... by ghurtado on Friday January 27, 2017 @10:18AM (#13500243)
> Well, a zygote is a developing human being while a placenta is clearly not.

In that case, pro-lifers should have no issues with a pregnant woman asking her doctor to remove her placenta - as long as they don't touch the zygote.

Re:Paralyzed man regains use of arms and hands after experim... by ferongr on Friday January 27, 2017 @10:36AM (#13500367)
Wouldn't that equate to imprisoning someone but not providing them with food?
Re:Paralyzed man regains use of arms and hands after experim... by komali2 on Monday January 30, 2017 @05:41PM (#13525782)
Or the equivalent of removing life support and having them die slowly and painfully, rather than simply administering an overdose of morphine. I do like that the issues blend at this point, though - removing the placenta is something I haven't considered. It would be legal because you can legally take someone off life support.
Re:Paralyzed man regains use of arms and hands after experim... by Arizhel on Friday January 27, 2017 @11:25AM (#13500673)
It seems to equate to imprisoning someone in the house of a very poor person who can only afford to feed themselves, and requiring that poor person to provide the prisoner with food, and then punishing the poor person when they refuse.
Re:Paralyzed man regains use of arms and hands after experim... by spacemanmatt on Sunday January 29, 2017 @12:16PM (#13515184)
Do you prefer to force the mother to feed and host a parasitic child against her will? That's pretty uh...totalitarian.