Re:Trump bans EPA employees from giving social media updates
by vacri on Tuesday January 24, 2017 @09:56PM
(#13478058)
On HN, you cannot downvote a direct reply to your comment, so you can't punish an explanation provided to you.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Trump bans EPA employees from giving social media updates
by wallacoloo on Wednesday January 25, 2017 @02:47AM
(#13479550)
How does one downvote a comment on HN? I thought maybe there was some reputation or age requirement, but I've been here a while now & I still don't see any option to downvote comments.
Re:Trump bans EPA employees from giving social media updates
by cyberferret on Wednesday January 25, 2017 @03:19AM
(#13479690)
How many Karma points do you have? (top right). I don't think I could downvote until I got to about 1000 or 1500 points, I believe.
Re:Trump bans EPA employees from giving social media updates
by type0 on Wednesday January 25, 2017 @05:17AM
(#13480210)
I feel that it should actually be raised to over 9000.
Re:Trump bans EPA employees from giving social media updates
by nylonstrung on Wednesday January 25, 2017 @02:16PM
(#13484898)
I'd downvote this if I could
Re:Trump bans EPA employees from giving social media updates
by Semaphor on Wednesday January 25, 2017 @03:26AM
(#13479721)
I think you need over 500 karma to downvote. I couldn't downvote for my first few years here (and I probably only downvoted posts once or twice since I could)
Re:Trump bans EPA employees from giving social media updates
by bildung on Wednesday January 25, 2017 @03:22AM
(#13479704)
The threshold is at 500 karma points.
Re:Trump bans EPA employees from giving social media updates
by cyberferret on Tuesday January 24, 2017 @10:58PM
(#13478363)
I actually upvoted @DanielBMarkham, because I thought his comment added value, and he did explain very well that it wasn't aimed directly at my post! :)
Re:Trump bans EPA employees from giving social media updates
by vacri on Wednesday January 25, 2017 @01:11AM
(#13479091)
My point was more that if you're being 'punished' for a comment, it's not the person you're replying to that is doing it - that is, it's not the person asking for the explanation that's punishing it.
I think that the GP is being unfair, though. Complaining about arguments specifically on the topic of politics? That's the essence of politics - conflict and how to deal with it. If people didn't disagree on a topic, it wouldn't be political. Outside of political topics, I'd say the bulk of explanations offered on HN are upvoted or at lest left neutral.