Seed would not be the limiting factor. Land would.
I feel fortunate to live on a bit more than one acre of suburban land that would be relatively appropriate for farming. But if you plow up the entire lawn, cut down the trees, and discount the drain field, house, and driveway, and don't purchase feed for livestock, that's just not enough area to feed my family.
And most people in my area don't have an acre. Sure, some local farmers have hundreds or thousands of acres - but there are a lot more people who only have a second-story apartment or a small city lot.
It's a simple problem of economies of scale. If you have a tractor, it's much, much easier to go from 10 acres to 100 acres than it is to go from 0 acres to 1 acre.
Even so, it seems a strange thing to worry about.
Am I the only one that found this to be high, and comforting?
I looked up how many software engineers there are in the US, it's also around 1% (3.6m) [1]
About 0.5% of us are lawyers [2]
Double-checking the farmers stat, it seems there are 2.1m farms [3], each must be manned by at least several people that know stuff. This does not count casual horticulturists. I'd guess that at least over 10% of the population would know how to grow food to feed a family.
1. http://www.computerworld.com/article/2483690/it-careers/indi...
2. https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2014/05/09/the-lawyer-bu...
3. https://www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/2012/Preliminary_...