News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:SpaceX returns to flight with Falcon 9 rocket launch by simonh on Sunday January 15, 2017 @10:44AM (#13404468)
>What exactly is the breakthroughs/discoveries that Spacex have made that will justify the claim.

The breakthrough is actually doing it. A lot of space engineers were saying before Falcon 9 that what SoaceX were trying to do was impossible.

Hindsight is 20/20. It's easy to see now what steps were required to pull this off and that clearly those steps were possible. But if it's so clear, why wasn't it done before? The ottoman line is only Must and SoaceX were prepared to get the job done. Nobody else was even trying.

Re:SpaceX returns to flight with Falcon 9 rocket launch by babyrainbow on Sunday January 15, 2017 @11:29AM (#13404691)
>The breakthrough is actually doing it...

That is not a breakthrough.

Re:SpaceX returns to flight with Falcon 9 rocket launch by snovv_crash on Sunday January 15, 2017 @01:31PM (#13405499)
Not all breakthroughs are just theory. If you can show me someone actually managing to land a launch-capable rocket, and not just some testbed demo capable of throttling to less than hover, I'm all ears.

The only other player in this space is Blue Origin, and they are still working on their commercially-viable engines. Everybody else throws away their rocket after the launch.

Re:SpaceX returns to flight with Falcon 9 rocket launch by babyrainbow on Sunday January 15, 2017 @07:11PM (#13407356)
> If you can show me someone actually managing to land a launch-capable rocket, and not just some testbed demo capable of throttling to less than hover, I'm all ears.

Are you saying only SpaceX is capable of doing this? Seriously?

Re:SpaceX returns to flight with Falcon 9 rocket launch by avmich on Monday January 16, 2017 @02:16AM (#13408606)
Are you saying that only USA were able to put a man on the Moon in 1960-s? Seriously?
Re:SpaceX returns to flight with Falcon 9 rocket launch by babyrainbow on Monday January 16, 2017 @08:44AM (#13409897)
No. That would be an utterly moronic claim if someone made it..
Re:SpaceX returns to flight with Falcon 9 rocket launch by snrplfth on Monday January 16, 2017 @11:18AM (#13410806)
Here's what they actually did that was novel:

- Building an engine capable of multiple restarts while facing into a supersonic headwind, which are necessary for any kind of successful propulsive landing.

- Designing a mass-thrifty first stage simultaneously lightweight enough to be able to accommodate the added weight of landing equipment, but strong enough to handle the tensile stress and buffeting of atmospheric reentry.

- Developing ultralight landing legs to enable stable landings at low mass cost.

But most of the innovation has been in the realm of integrating existing technology in new ways. They brought together cold gas thrusters, grid fins, and thrust vectoring - none of which were new - into a complete package capable of precisely controlling the flight of a 15-storey first stage from the upper atmosphere to the ground. It's the act of getting technologies to work together that is often the source of the greatest gains.

[edit for format]