News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Beautiful Image Hover Effect Using Only Webkit CSS (No JS).

Re:Beautiful Image Hover Effect Using Only Webkit CSS (No JS) by CoryMathews on Tuesday May 11, 2010 @09:46AM (#1337772)
Arrrrg he used only the -webkit hacks and did not put the actual CSS3 commands for other browsers.

i.e. -webkit-box-shadow:0px 0px 30px #ccc; should have box-shadow:0px 0px 30px #ccc; and so on. It just ruined the entire article..

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Beautiful Image Hover Effect Using Only Webkit CSS (No JS) by nikeshhayaran on Tuesday May 11, 2010 @10:42AM (#1337969)
It is just an example to show how differently we can use CSS3 transition property ... I don't think it ruined the entire article..
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Beautiful Image Hover Effect Using Only Webkit CSS (No JS) by chunkyslink on Tuesday May 11, 2010 @11:40AM (#1338224)
No, I completely agree. But I work with some CSS purists and they would probably think the same thing. Ruined I tell you ! RUINED !
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Beautiful Image Hover Effect Using Only Webkit CSS (No JS) by rimantas on Tuesday May 11, 2010 @04:41PM (#1339137)
CSS purist should learn that vendor prefixes are not hacks.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Beautiful Image Hover Effect Using Only Webkit CSS (No JS) by rokhayakebe on Tuesday May 11, 2010 @03:07PM (#1338897)
From the comments it says you should switch -webkit to -moz for Firefox, I believe.
[ Parent | on HN ]