News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:King – man + woman is queen; but why? by stephencanon on Saturday January 07, 2017 @05:57PM (#13347176)
Right, I don't deny that you get something sort of vector-ish and some operations that make intuitive sense some of the time. That's cool enough on its own! There's no need to pretend that we've actually constructed a vector space. Just say that we've arranged words on a hypersphere with an inferred distance metric and call it a day.

(Also, by "scalar product" I meant "scalar multiplication"--the product of a scalar and a vector, not the dot product. It's pretty clear how to make some sense out of the dot product, but it's pretty hard to make consistent sense out of scalar multiplication. Apologies for being unclear.)

Re:King – man + woman is queen; but why? by moultano on Saturday January 07, 2017 @09:56PM (#13347988)
There isn't a word at every point in the space. Is that your objection to calling it a vector space? I think of every point in space as representing subtle gradiations of concepts, only some of which are instantiated by words.
Re:King – man + woman is queen; but why? by stared on Saturday January 07, 2017 @06:14PM (#13347240)
In any case "vector-ish" is an appropriate word here. As with logistic regression for complex problems:

"Essentially, all models are wrong, but some are useful." - George Box