News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Reasons not to use Skype (2012) by dandandan on Saturday January 07, 2017 @03:33AM (#13343021)
You don't need to be Facebook friends to complete a call but I can still see that expectation being an obstacle to establishing one. Is there a space for a very simple WebRTC call application? It seems like everyone is focused on video calling or more full-featured products.
Re:Reasons not to use Skype (2012) by wonko1 on Saturday January 07, 2017 @03:51AM (#13343078)
I'd love it if the default was to use some very lightweight WebRTC app where you just created a new link for each conversation.

I don't think it's likely to happen any time soon unfortunately.

Regarding Facebook, it still feels weird, I'm not sure I can put my finger on exactly why. I just want to keep "friends" and "business" totally separate.

Re:Reasons not to use Skype (2012) by jhoechtl on Saturday January 07, 2017 @07:12AM (#13343736)
How was this service Mozilla once included in their browser called, something from Telefonica? Worked pretty well for me. Maybe they ditched it to early?
Re:Reasons not to use Skype (2012) by senko on Saturday January 07, 2017 @04:02AM (#13343103)
No as long as it is not supported by mobile safari, thereby cutting a large swath of situations where such an app would be useful. We've had WebRTC calls as "experimental" for years now in https://awwapp.com/ solely because of this limitation.

Once you invest more in working around this by having native clients, it makes sense for your product to do more.