Re:The Real Name Fallacy
by EekSnakePond on Wednesday January 04, 2017 @03:54PM
(#13321938)
An almost acceptable pivot, if it wasn't for the sealioning accusation in the parent.
I stand by the sealioning accusation. I calls 'em as I sees 'em. I think the poster was sealioning, and I'm not going to engage with someone beyond that.
You want to? Go for it. I am not, nor is anyone else, obligated to.
I, for one, approach every discussion online with cautious open-mindedness. My time is limited. It doesn't take much for me to want to direct my energies elsewhere.
You can call it virtue-signalling, you can say that asking questions is forbidden, I can say that I'm under no obligation to talk to you or anyone.
And I've learned, through my own experience, that there's a familiar form of discussion that I am not interested in having; the person I responded to hit that form and showed me my energy is better spent elsewhere.
You can talk to them all you want. It's a big internet. I don't have to, and I won't.