News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Getting Past C by zem on Tuesday January 03, 2017 @10:10PM (#13315366)
I think it's a massive programming ecosystem blind spot that "depending on c" is seen as less of a burden than depending on rust
Re:Getting Past C by kazinator on Tuesday January 03, 2017 @11:12PM (#13315625)
How many chip and SoC vendors provide a Rust toolchain? In the case of C, the answer is basically "about as many as provide a toolchain".
Re:Getting Past C by pjmlp on Wednesday January 04, 2017 @03:12AM (#13316559)
In 2016, yes.

All the way through the 80's up to the early 90's, C toolchains only mattered to those that were working on UNIX workstations and servers. On home computers it was just, yet another language, with compilers generating slower code than junior Assembly programmers.

So of course Rust has to catch up a few decades of market use.

Re:Getting Past C by zem on Tuesday January 03, 2017 @11:37PM (#13315718)
sure, use c if that's all you can use, but if rust does target your system it adds no more overhead than c does.

tangentially, ats has had some success in that area since it compiles via c. but I agree that c is less work to get set up with.