Re:100% of US Warming Is Due to NOAA Data Tampering
by jrs235 on Wednesday December 28, 2016 @10:22AM
(#13271020)
You are probably getting down votes for insinuating a conspiracy that the admins/moderators are doing this. If it was deleted you'd see [dead] next to the title. I would assume a more benign reason: other HN readers are flagging it.
Re:100% of US Warming Is Due to NOAA Data Tampering
by dang on Wednesday December 28, 2016 @12:31PM
(#13272032)
[dead] doesn't indicate admin action either, at least not directly. It happens when either (a) a lot of users flagged the submission; (b) the site is banned; (c) the submitter is banned.
Re:100% of US Warming Is Due to NOAA Data Tampering
by jrs235 on Wednesday December 28, 2016 @01:51PM
(#13272633)
Thanks for the clarification and info Dan.
Re:100% of US Warming Is Due to NOAA Data Tampering
by mcphage on Wednesday December 28, 2016 @10:23AM
(#13271028)
This site has shown up repeatedly on HN, and always been dismissed due to bad science. Maybe this article is different, but who's going to bother wasting their time to find out?
Re:100% of US Warming Is Due to NOAA Data Tampering
by throwaway4891a on Thursday December 29, 2016 @12:49AM
(#13275858)
Alt-right gonna keep shoveling billionaire propaganda and/or InfoWars/Unabomber beliefs onto every and any memetic channel, because shouting lies loud/often enough is sadly rewarded by changing sentiment in low-fact environments. (Doesn't really work so well on HN because of pervasive motivation for fact-challenging and argumentativeness.)
Re:100% of US Warming Is Due to NOAA Data Tampering
by mcphage on Thursday December 29, 2016 @01:36PM
(#13279060)
Enough people believe "where there's smoke, there's fire", that if you keep pumping smoke over and over, some of them will eventually assume that there's a fire.
Re:100% of US Warming Is Due to NOAA Data Tampering
by dang on Wednesday December 28, 2016 @12:29PM
(#13272022)
Users flagged it. Admins didn't touch it.
Users were right to flag it, since this is a classic flamewar topic, and discussions of those tend to be predictable, ideological, and angry—none of which gratifies intellectual curiosity, which is what this site is for.
I'm pretty sure when I saw this it was on the front page, now it's totally disappeared, except from the "New" tab.
[All these downvotes, but no reply. Am I wrong about this? If so, say so.]